Sec 3 Elective Geography ProjectIntroduction:The recent property boom has seen a surge in the prices of luxury homes. Property developers have paid high prices for land in Sentosa at S$1361 per square foot (psf). One luxury home development called Sentosa Cove, is marketed as one of the world's most exclusive oceanfront residential community.
Task:You will work in groups of four arranged by the teacher.
Your group will be a luxury property developer specializing in waterfront homes.
You will use the internet to research on waterfront housing.
You will use the information you gathered to design a poster or display or video and use the information gathered to create a campaign commercial that can be played in the classroom.
The poster/display/video will be part of your oral presentation along with the commercial.
Your main focus as a group is to convince would-be buyers (your class and teacher) that your property is the most luxurious investment and is safe against all threats of coastal processes and sea level rise due to global warming.
Date of presentation will start the week starting 30 July 2007
Marks will be awarded for Term 4 CA results.
Process:Living on Sentosa:
Sentosa CoveProperty Developer Ho BeeCoral IslandThreatsSea Level Risehttp://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=7708http://www.straitstimes.com/Free/Story/STIStory_132531.htmlhttp://malaysia-today.net/reports/2006_06_06_MT_reports_archive.htmManagementGreat Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority: Water Quality IssuesCoastal Management in AustraliaHard EngineeringEvaluation
Scale 1: Knowledge4 Demonstrates a though, accurate and coherent explanation of the topic.
Clearly identifies theme for the project.
Appropriate and relevant facts are gathered and well organized.
3 Demonstrates a fairly thorough and reasonably accurate explanation of the topic. Adequately identifies theme for project. Facts gathered are adequate but minimal.
2 Partial explanation of topic given with key elements missing. Theme is not identified correctly. Facts are muddled and unorganized.
1 No explanation of topic. Theme not presented appropriately.
Basic information is inadequate.
Scale II: Quality of Presentation4 Topic is related to theme and is presented imaginatively.
The project is extremely creative and effectively tells a clear, concise story that stands on its own. Project excellently flows logically from beginning to end.
Physical appearance of project shows sophistication and attention to detail in terms of typing & proofreading, neatness, etc.
3 Topic is related to the theme.
The exhibit is interesting and tells a clear story that stands on its own.
The project adequately flows from beginning to end.
Good physical appearance of project.
Minor flaws in attention to detail in terms of typing, proofreading, neatness, etc.
2 Topic shows vague references to the theme.
The exhibit tells an unclear story and is missing vital elements.
The project cannot stand on its own.
Major errors in attention to detail.
1 Topic is not related to the theme.
Overall project lacks clarity. Gross errors in attention to detail.
Scale III: Quality of Analysis4 Clearly tells the inter-relationship between man and the environment- the need for coastal management.
Effectively deals with a problem or question and proceeds to resolve or answer it.
Formulates a conclusion statement.
Strong supportive arguments are used.
Resolutions are persuasive and based on research.
3 Tells the inter-relationship between man and the environment- the need for coastal management.
Addresses problem and resolves them.
Supportive arguments are somewhat clear and organized.
Resolutions are fairly persuasive.
2 Insufficiently tells the inter-relationship between man and the environment- the need for coastal management.
Project barely addresses problems.
Arguments are vague and unclear.
Shows little evidence of resolution of problem.
1 Project fails to tell about the inter-relationship between man and the environment- the need for coastal management.
Project scarcely addresses problems.
Arguments are not supported.
Problems are not resolved.
Scale IV: Quality of Sources4 Bibliography includes exceptional sources.
Sources consulted include several institutions.
Bibliography includes a wide variety of primary and secondary sources.
3 Bibliography includes sufficient sources.
Sources consulted include one or two institutions.
Bibliography includes a sufficient number of primary and secondary sources.
2 Bibliography lacks sufficient sources.
Sources consulted included at least one institution.
Bibliography included an insufficient number of primary and secondary sources.
1 Bibliography is inaccurate or missing.
Total: Max 16 points